Recent advances in
neurotechnology including wearable brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), Neuralink
implants, and AI-driven neural decoding are making it possible to translate
brain activity into actions, speech, images and emotions, blurring the line
between human cognition and digital systems. Devices ranging from MIT’s
EEG-equipped glasses to Neuralink’s implanted chips demonstrate both the
medical potential of BCIs and their growing commercial interest. These systems raise
profound concerns: they can decode sensitive traits, track attention and
emotion, and potentially manipulate mental states, opening possibilities for
misuse by companies, governments or political actors.

As the neurotech industry rapidly
expands, the risks of consumer devices collecting neural data with little
regulation are becoming increasingly urgent. This growing capability has triggered global debates about
neural privacy, cognitive liberty, and whether new neurorights are needed.
Countries such as Chile and Spain, several U.S. states, and international
bodies have begun exploring legal protections for identity, agency and mental
privacy. Advocates argue that traditional human rights are insufficient for
technologies that can read or alter neural processes, while others warn that
proliferating new rights may cause legal confusion.
More information:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/14/magazine/neurotech-neuralink-rights-regulations.html